Now John adds to his vision, this time he sees
a second beast, coming out of the earth. It had two horns like a lamb, but it spoke like a dragon. 12 It exercised all the authority of the first beast on its behalf, and made the earth and its inhabitants worship the first beast, whose fatal wound had been healed. 13 And it performed great signs, even causing fire to come down from heaven to the earth in full view of the people.
We always need to remember that while God’s word is for us, it was not written to us. If we believe the latter, we will ignore the historical context in which it was written, and how the people to whom it was written would have understood it. Only by understanding that will we be able to understand its meaning for us. Revelation is easily misunderstood by those who fail to make this distinction, and chapter 13 is one of the most often misunderstood. The beauty of John’s words and vision is that when understood in its historical context, it means so much more to us today. We’ve seen there is no one anti-Christ, but many anti-Christs, and that Christians will not be spared suffering (as in a Rapture) if God has called them to it. Rather, through all of human history God’s people have been called to an eternal hope. We can never be defeated because those who trust in the Resurrection and the Life will never die!
We’re introduced to a second beast, this one coming out of the earth instead of the sea. We’ll notice the narrative previously was in the past tense, while this is present tense. Things happened with the first beast, with this beast they are happening now. John’s readers would know what he’s talking about because they are experiencing it. While the first beast references Roman imperial power, this beast references that power extended to rulers in Asia where John’s readers lived. This beast rules on the first’s behalf, extends its power, and forces emperor worship on the inhabitants. The cult of the emperor was an all pervasive threat to Christians in the Roman Empire prior to Constantine, as it is in our day but in non-religious forms. This beast seems like it could be harmless, like a lamb, but it is in fact deadly as a dragon. Also, having having been fatally wounded, now seemingly back from the dead appears indestructible; it is easy to imagine the Roman Empire certainly appeared that way at the time, as was and is the power of the state throughout history.
Whatever the great signs refer to, magic and demonic activity were not unknown in that ancient context; the contrast to God and his power is the point. The reference to fire coming down from heaven would have evoked images in the minds of John’s readers of the great battle of Elijah with the prophets of Baal, and we know how that ended. Whatever wonders and signs they perform, they are nothing compared to the power of Almighty God, but they do have deceptive power:
14 Because of the signs it was given power to perform on behalf of the first beast, it deceived the inhabitants of the earth. It ordered them to set up an image in honor of the beast who was wounded by the sword and yet lived. 15 The second beast was given power to give breath to the image of the first beast, so that the image could speak and cause all who refused to worship the image to be killed.
We see here yet again, the power, however it manifests itself then and throughout history, is a given power. The beasts of the earth that have come down through history only have power because they are given it. We may hate that, wonder at it, be angry with God about it, but the power is never absolute, so it cannot deceive God’s people. To John’s readers, this scene was all too horribly real. The first beast we read seemed dead (some think it refers to the Roman civil war after Nero’s death), but while it may have appeared that way, its power is very real, and deadly. Building statues of the emperors and forcing them to be worshiped was common, and anyone who refused could be killed. The image speaking is a metaphor for Roman power wielded locally, which had very real consequences, and not always so stark as life and death.
16 It also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads, 17 so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name.
Now we’re getting into territory common to those who obsess over “end times.” This is a favorite passage of premillennial dispensationalists who interpret it as a specific period at the end of time when The Antichrist will appear, and this mark will be a part of his Satanic rule on earth. The tendency of those who read it this way is a kind of literalism where we read this as a literal mark on literal right hands and foreheads. But as we saw, the word antichrist is never used in Revelation, and only in I John. Revelation is also symbolic from beginning to end, so the “literal” reading isn’t plausible. I should add verse 18 to fill out the picture:
18 This calls for wisdom. Let the person who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. That number is 666.
These three verses have lead to all kinds of wild speculation about who this man is, and how his universal control (all people) will be carried out. This can never be fruitful because such speculation has nothing to do with what John is communicating to his readers. Remember rule number one in biblical hermeneutics I mentioned above, context. John is not writing secret messages to people 2,000 years into the future; he’s writing to Christians enduring persecution living in the first century Roman Empire. So the proper question to ask is, what would this mean to them?
First, marks on or in the skin were common in the ancient world, and a way of showing who belonged where. The beast, as we saw, is symbolic of the power of the Roman Empire and the totalitarian control over those they ruled. It also references down through history those state powers who would claim the allegiance only God can demand. The question for John’s readers, and us, is loyalty, to whom do we belong, God or the state. John is making the contrast with those who have been sealed by God and a mark put on their foreheads (7:3). No doubt this also would have brought to mind in John’s readers Deuteronomy 11:18, and tying God’s word as a reminder on their hands and foreheads.
Regarding “the number of a man,” John is not playing games and trying to hide who this might be. Those who have wisdom and understanding get it, that 666 is the number of ultimate imperfection (7 is the symbolic biblical number for fullness and perfection), and the man would likely have brought to their minds Nero, the ultimate persecutor of the early church. He would also be a symbol of the persecution they were enduring and would have to endure off and on for another two hundred years. It references as well persecution Christians have endured throughout history and continue to endure into our day. Where does our loyalty lie? Which mark will we carry on our body? It is, as we say nowadays, a binary choice; nobody said it would be easy.
Recent Comments