We now come to what are called Paul’s pastoral epistles. Unlike his previous letters which are to entire churches, these letters are written to young pastors Timothy and Titus, thus pastoral. Paul gives them explicit and thorough instructions on how churches should be run, which makes them unique among his letters. They are also letters of personal encouragement and exhortation because being a pastor is never easy, but I imagine it was especially challenging in a time when the church was just getting off the ground. As we’ll see, Timothy is God’s shepherd of the church in Ephesus in what was then called Asia Minor, on the west coast of Modern Turkey. He calls Timothy his “true son in the faith,” so his letters are an older man, a mentor, teaching his beloved student.
Paul met Timothy on his second missionary journey, which we read about in Acts 16. Paul had spent time in Antioch with Barnabas (Acts 15), and they decided to head out and visit the churches they had established on their first missionary journey. The two had a falling out over John Mark, whom Paul didn’t trust, so they split. God turned their dispute into a positive, creating the opportunity for two missionary teams; one being Barnabas and John Mark who traveled to Cyprus and the other, Paul and Silas who traveled to Asia Minor. God providentially redirected Paul and Silas to Greece, bringing the gospel to Europe, which changed the world.
In almost every letter Paul establishes his Apostolic bona fides. He’s especially strong here:
Paul, an apostle of Christ Jesus by the command of God our Savior and of Christ Jesus our hope,
2 To Timothy my true son in the faith:
Although the letter is to Timothy, Paul knows it will be shared widely, and he’s placing his divine apostolic authority front and center on his affirmation of Timothy. I’d guess he does this just in case anyone is tempted to question Timothy’s authority given his youth.
Notice the Triune implications of his greeting. I’ve mentioned this numerous times, but it bears repeating. Many critics and skeptics (of the Dan Brown Da Vinci Code variety) have insisted that Jesus never claimed to be divine, and that the church basically invented that over time and officially adopted it by the Council of Nicea in 325. That is so obviously untrue to any fair minded reader of the New Testament, including this verse. If you look at the use of the word Savior in Paul (and Peter, John, and Jude) you’ll see that both God and Jesus are referred to with that title, which means the church saw Jesus as God from the very beginning. And he affirms Timothy as a worthy heir to the faith he is fighting for.
He then warns against false teachers:
3 As I urged you when I went into Macedonia, stay there in Ephesus so that you may command certain people not to teach false doctrines any longer 4 or to devote themselves to myths and endless genealogies. Such things promote controversial speculations rather than advancing God’s work—which is by faith.
We can infer from this that Timothy may have wanted to give up and leave Ephesus, but Paul won’t have it. Working with sinful people in ministry is a tough job, but running away is rarely the answer. We’re all called to contend for the faith, but that’s what ministers get paid to do, so contend they must.
As Paul’s son in the faith, Timothy, didn’t inherit his Apostolic authority, but as a leader in the church he does possess real authority, and Paul wants him to use it. That Paul’s concern is false doctrines means there are true doctrines. I know that’s obvious, but it always needs to be affirmed that Christianity isn’t a smorgasbord religion. People don’t get to pick and choose what they want to believe. There is no true for you, but not for me in Christianity. Christians disagree on many things, but all who claim the name of Christ agree on the core truths of the faith, Mere Christianity as C.S. Lewis wrote about, and what is affirmed in the Nicene Creed.
In contrast to false doctrines, Paul highlights what are basically distractions. I’m not sure what kind of myths he might be referring to, but clearly they have no basis in Scripture because they are speculation, human guessing with no basis in historical or biblical fact. Even speculation that extends from the Bible should be avoided, for example, how God’s sovereignty and human free will work. All we can say is they are both true, and we have absolutely no idea. Some things we can know, things God has revealed, and others we cannot, and wisdom knows the difference (Deut. 29:29). Genealogies would be a Jewish issue because they were an important part of Jewish religion as we can see from our Bibles. Obviously some people were obsessing over them, and they needed to stop. And what does Paul contrast these useless exercises to? God’s work! Which is all about trusting him (faith) for the concrete things he has done for us, and does in us to apply what he has done.
In this context, Paul again comes back to what for him is the quintessence of the Christian faith:
5 The goal of this command is love, which comes from a pure heart and a good conscience and a sincere faith.
This would be agapé love, that which is grounded in moral preference for the other. And he uses one of my favorite Greek words for goal, telos-έλος, properly, consummation (the end-goal, purpose), such as closure with all its results. There is nothing phony or hypocritical or self-serving about it. This kind of love is always the telos of Paul’s gospel. Otherwise you have meaningless talk which leads people away from the faith. He says some of these people think they are a big deal, “but they do not know what they are talking about or what they so confidently affirm.” This is always what happens when people get too far afield from God’s word.
Recent Comments